# The New Trust Economy in Financial Services Trust used to be a one-way decision: banks judged consumers, and consumers had little say. That direction has flipped, and most institutions haven't noticed. Source: https://amplitude.com/en-us/blog/trust-economy-financial-services --- [Mark Drasutis](/blog/author/mark-drasutis) [Head of Value, Asia Pacific and Japan, Amplitude](/blog/author/mark-drasutis) [](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Famplitude.com%2Fblog%2F%2Fblog%2Ftrust-economy-financial-services)[](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Famplitude.com%2Fblog%2F%2Fblog%2Ftrust-economy-financial-services)[](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Famplitude.com%2Fblog%2F%2Fblog%2Ftrust-economy-financial-services\&text=The%20New%20Trust%20Economy%20in%20Financial%20Services)[](mailto:?subject=Checkout%20this%20Amplitude%20Article\&body=Check%20this%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Famplitude.com%2Fblog%2F%2Fblog%2Ftrust-economy-financial-services) Financial services have always run on a one-way test. A bank decided whether you were creditworthy. An insurer decided whether your risk was worth taking. Credit scoring, underwriting, and KYC: the whole system existed so the institution could assess the customer before entrusting any funds. That direction has flipped, and most institutions haven't noticed. Every time someone opens an app to move money, buy a policy, or apply for credit, they're running that same test back on the institution. - Does this institution understand me? - Does it behave consistently? - Can I trust it with what happens next? It happens whether the bank is watching or not. A traditional bank, an FX business, or a crypto exchange is being scored by the same customer using the same test, every time they interact, and only one side of that relationship can see the results. ## Trust used to be inherited. Now it's earned in every session. Traditionally, consumer trust in a financial institution was inherited rather than earned in the moment. A bank's age told you it had survived enough cycles to be safe. Its branch network told you it was too big to vanish overnight. Its regulatory license told you the state had already vouched for it. Switching banks was expensive, and information about alternatives was scarce, so customers rarely bothered. That consumer trust could last a lifetime, sometimes across generations. That model is breaking down fastest where financial services are growing fastest. For example, in Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Singapore, huge numbers of new customers manage money entirely through an app. No branch visits, relationship managers, or decades-long track record of stability. Over the last five years, regulators in the APAC region, including Indonesia's OJK, Malaysia's BNM, and Singapore's MAS, have issued new digital licenses to test whether a new entrant can quickly earn trust. It's a live, region-wide experiment in whether trust can be built from zero, in public, in real time. The results are in. Trust in financial services isn't earned through a credential anymore. It's a live behavioral score, earned continuously through the product experience. ## Three institutions, three silent tests, three different results The race for consumer trust is playing out inside the banking product experience, but many institutions aren't watching closely enough to know how they're doing. These three examples show what it looks like when an institution can, or cannot, see what customers are experiencing in the moment. ### Romania's first fully digital neobank [Salt Bank](https://salt.bank/), Romania's first fully digital neobank, discovered within weeks of its 2024 launch that a large share of new customers weren't activating their accounts. Adoption hinged on a single customer question: How easy is it for me to use my money? Many of their customers assumed they needed their physical card to use their accounts. So they waited, delaying their activation. When Salt Bank's product team [observed this behavior](https://amplitude.com/case-studies/salt-bank), they took action. The fix was a product enhancement to show them how their money worked, not a marketing campaign asserting the bank's trust. Activations rose 80 percent, but only because the bank could observe and act on user behavior in real time. ### A global digital bank built around Bitcoin [Xapo Bank](https://www.xapobank.com/en), a global digital bank built around Bitcoin, faced an even more challenging starting point. Their customer base was already skeptical of banks, and they were spread across countries with different identity norms. Its identity verification process was experiencing a steep drop-off. The working assumption within the business was that applicants were submitting poor-quality documents. [Behavioral data](https://amplitude.com/case-studies/xapo-bank) revealed the real problem: the bank was applying a single global assumption about identity documents that didn't hold across all countries. In many regions, applicants simply didn't hold the type of document that it defaulted to requiring. Once Xapo Bank adapted its verification process to reflect regional realities, the number of applicants who started the process rose by 50 percent. Once Xapo understood each customer's actual circumstances, at the exact moment identity mattered most, trust followed. ### An Indian insurtech [ACKO](https://www.acko.com/), the Indian insurtech, shows the impact of understanding user behavior and reading test results with real precision. The product team ran a time-bound discount to cross-sell health insurance that lifted conversion by 41 percent. The customers who took the discount converted from quote to payment 200 percent faster. Discounts can sometimes read as desperation rather than good faith, resulting in a drop in average order value. But that wasn't the case. Average order value did not fall as expected. Existing customers used the lower entry price to add broader family coverage rather than buy the minimum. Customers scored the discount as evidence of understanding, not desperation. ACKO only knew that because it was [watching the behavior](https://amplitude.com/blog/acko-drove-more-conversions-with-genai) closely enough to see the difference in real time. ## The trust test doesn't end at onboarding Across the US, the UK, and Latin America, digital-first banks consistently post higher satisfaction scores than traditional banks among customers who hold accounts with both types of banks. [63 percent of American customers](https://yougov.com/en-us/reports/53276-us-best-bank-rankings-2025) say they are very satisfied with their digital bank, compared with [55 percent](https://www.aba.com/about-us/press-room/press-releases/consumer-survey-banking-methods-2024) for their traditional one. The gap is even wider in Mexico. [Simon-Kucher's research](https://www.simon-kucher.com/en/insights/neobanking-australia-competitive-and-growing-conversion-yet-follow) finds the same pattern: neobanks lead in customer satisfaction, particularly in digital experience. Why? Because they treat the customer journey itself as the product, tested and refined continuously, rather than as a project delivered once and left alone. Challengers tend to win at onboarding because they built their organizations around noticing when something isn't working. But the same research shows the advantage isn't equal across the entire customer lifecycle. [JD Power's 2026 Direct Banking Satisfaction Study](https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2026-us-direct-banking-satisfaction-study/) found that federally chartered online banks outperform neobanks in overall satisfaction. The study identified a specific weak spot: neobanks experience more frequent customer problems, paired with weaker phone and chat support when something goes wrong. What earns trust at onboarding is speed and clarity. What keeps trust when a card is lost, a payment fails, or a transaction needs to be disputed is how easily and reliably a customer can get the help they need. Many challengers win the first moment and lose the second. A customer who can't get help when they need it most loses trust faster than a slow onboarding process ever does. This is what classic banks should pursue. The opportunity to extend the same behavioral discipline to the parts of the journey neobanks have not yet mastered. A bank that can see, in real time, exactly where a customer is stuck in a support flow, and can test and improve that moment with the same rigor a neobank applies to onboarding, will close the gap the digital-first model has not yet tackled. ## Why Asia is the sharpest test of this shift This shift is most visible across Asia's fastest-growing financial services markets. In much of the developed world, digital banking competes against a customer's existing branch relationship. The switch is a comparison between two known quantities. However, in large parts of Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam, a large share of new customers have no prior formal banking relationship to compare against. Their first experience with a financial institution is via a mobile app, which means there is no inherited trust to fall back on, for the challenger or the incumbent. This changes what the region's own regulators are demanding. Singapore's MAS, Indonesia's OJK, and Malaysia's BNM are all shifting supervision from prescriptive, one-time compliance checks toward outcomes-based operational resilience. They're judging institutions on whether they can demonstrably absorb and recover from disruption, rather than simply proving they met a rulebook once at launch. The implication for the region's classic banks is that decades of brand and branch history no longer guarantee inherited trust with their own newest customers either. A twenty-five-year-old opening their first savings account in Jakarta or Kuala Lumpur has grown up with digital product experiences (ride-hailing, e-commerce, and messaging) that have consistently proven their reliability. These customers expect the same from the bank they choose, regardless of how many decades the bank has existed. ## What it takes to win: visibility and the ability to act on it The institutions that will win the next decade of financial services in Asia share a specific operating discipline rather than a specific business model. They use modern analytics and experimentation to keep a pulse on customer trust. This includes: - real-time visibility into how customers behave inside the product and where reassurance, clarity, or friction is showing up - a governed way to test and act on that signal continuously, rather than through annual review cycles Amplitude enables you to see everything customers do and understand what drives growth at scale, across financial institutions serving millions of customers. Statsig, now part of the same platform, delivers a governed experimentation engine to act on that signal quickly, with the audit trail and guardrails a regulated institution's risk function requires before any change reaches a live customer. ## The institutions that win will be the ones paying attention The old dividing line in financial services was age against youth, incumbent against challenger, branch against app. None of those distinctions predict who earns trust from the next generation of financial customers. What predicts it is whether an institution understands how customers are actually behaving, continuously, before a customer just leaves. A bank with 160 years of history and a platform with two years of history are now judged by the same customer at the same speed. The institutions that figure this out fastest, across every license type and every market in the region, are the ones that will still be standing a decade from now. About the author Mark Drasutis Head of Value, Asia Pacific and Japan, Amplitude [More from ](/blog/author/mark-drasutis) [Mark](/blog/author/mark-drasutis) Mark Drasutis is the Head of Value, APJ at the leading digital analytics platform Amplitude. With more than 25 years of experience leading digital products, transformation and driving innovation, Mark is passionate about turning complex challenges into opportunities for growth. Topics [APJ](/blog/tag/apj) [Customer Experience](/blog/tag/customer-experience) [Financial Services](/blog/tag/financial-services) #### Recommended Reading [Read ](/blog/agent-data-security) [Product](/blog/agent-data-security) ###### [How to Secure AI Agent Traces Without Losing the Signal](/blog/agent-data-security) [Aug 28, 2026](/blog/agent-data-security) [7 min read](/blog/agent-data-security) [Read ](/blog/connecting-agent-performance-to-product-outcomes) [Product](/blog/connecting-agent-performance-to-product-outcomes) ###### [Connecting agent performance to product outcomes](/blog/connecting-agent-performance-to-product-outcomes) [Aug 20, 2026](/blog/connecting-agent-performance-to-product-outcomes) [10 min read](/blog/connecting-agent-performance-to-product-outcomes) [Read ](/blog/cashbook-ai-failure-rate) [Customers](/blog/cashbook-ai-failure-rate) ###### [The hidden cost of a bad AI answer](/blog/cashbook-ai-failure-rate) [Aug 19, 2026](/blog/cashbook-ai-failure-rate) [6 min read](/blog/cashbook-ai-failure-rate) [Read ](/blog/verification-loops) [Insights](/blog/verification-loops) ###### [Verification loops in software factories: What PMs need to know](/blog/verification-loops) [Aug 19, 2026](/blog/verification-loops) [11 min read](/blog/verification-loops)